Thursday, August 16, 2012

Dim-witted doctors

Brian Lilley:
The Canadian Medical Association ... is currently holding a General Council meeting in Yellowknife. The doctors decided to raise the issue of abortion and their fear that a motion by Conservative MP Stephen Woodworth might spell the end of abortion.
Two of the dimwits:
Montreal physician Dr. Genevieve Desbiens ... “This attempt to modify the definition of a human being could legally recognize the fetus, which would give the fetus rights. This constitutes a recriminalization, not only of abortion, but any form of contraception.”

Dr. Carole Williams, of Victoria, said the private member’s motion “is a back-door way for government to reopen Roe versus Wade,” the 1973 decision that legalized abortion in the United States.
at

7 comments:

  1. AlainAugust 16, 2012 at 8:05:00 PM PDT

    Keep in mind that above all and foremost these are agenda-driven political activists ahead of being "doctors". The same applies to the chiefs of police across the country. Their political agenda trumps health care, or in the case of the chiefs of police law enforcement.

    ReplyDelete
  2. DollopsAugust 17, 2012 at 7:28:00 AM PDT

    What liberals need to have burned (as with a CD) into their brains is that we don't define things like "human", "murder" and "marriage". Those concepts were understood long before any government, court or religion presumed to mess with their meanings.

    ReplyDelete
  3. oxygentaxAugust 17, 2012 at 12:59:00 PM PDT

    I think that Dr. Williams needs to go back to school. Apparently, in elementary school, it wasn't taught to her that we are a different legal jurisdiction than the US and that US court decisions have no bearing on the Canadian justice system.

    ReplyDelete
  4. DonAugust 18, 2012 at 12:02:00 PM PDT

    oxygentax: By her measure, we should be honouring the SCOTUS decisions that legalize open carry and concealed carry of handguns in canada.

    Liberals don't actually believe in full reciprocity though, just reciprocity in what they think are okay.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousAugust 18, 2012 at 8:13:00 PM PDT

    Roe vs Wade is more restrictive than no law whatsoever on abortion. So yes, give us "our" Roe vs Wade. Give us a trimester framework upon which to permit restrictions on abortions. Allow us to pass statutes which ban some 2nd and 3rd trimester abortive procedures.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousDecember 31, 2012 at 10:09:00 AM PST

    Remarkable! Its really amazing piece of writing, I have got much clear idea concerning from
    this post.
    Here is my page ; enquiry

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousDecember 31, 2012 at 10:16:00 AM PST

    Hello! Someone in my Myspace group shared this site with us so I came to give it
    a look. I'm definitely loving the information. I'm bookmarking and
    will be tweeting this to my followers! Outstanding blog and brilliant
    design and style.
    Here is my website ... directory

    ReplyDelete