Breaking: Paris Terror Attacks Kill More Than 100

NYT:

A hostage situation at the Bataclan concert hall came to an end on Friday night when French police raided the building, according to French television, who quoted the police as saying at least 100 people had been killed there.

Dozens more died in apparently coordinated attacks outside the country’s main sports stadium and at least five other popular locations in the city.

More: What about COP21?

And by all means, let's implore the nitwit Liberals to bring in even more Syrian migrants, and by Christmas, security checks be damned!

German compassion for refugees reaching its limits

New York Times breaking news:

Israeli election - the NYT concedes defeat

Netanyahu Soundly Defeats Chief Rival in Israeli Elections.

Also badly disappointed are the CBC and its many Israel-hating followers (see the comments)

 and as no doubt is Barack Obama after wasting taxpayers' money attempting to defeat Bibi:

NYT editors to Obama: kill Keystone XL

Editorial from today's New York Times:

The State Department’s latest environmental assessment of the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline makes no recommendation about whether President Obama should approve it. Here is ours. He should say no, and for one overriding reason: A president who has repeatedly identified climate change as one of humanity’s most pressing dangers cannot in good conscience approve a project that — even by the State Department’s most cautious calculations — can only add to the problem. ...

That's followed by several paragraphs of mostly bogus drivel straight out of the eco-loon propaganda manual.

Update:  Terence Corcoran weighs in: The New York Times calls for war on Canadian oil

... Following the Times’ advice, here’s a possible Keystone speech for Mr. Obama: “... I believe that climate change is one of humanity’s most pressing dangers. We need to decarbonize the world economy, and I think Canada is a good place to start ...."

New York Times - hypocrites and cowards

Pamela Geller:

REJECTED!
What the NY Times Won't Run: Counter-Jihad Facts
What the NY Times Will Run: Anti-Catholic Smear Ads ...

Who knew?

... We used the same language as the anti-Catholic ad. The only difference is, ours was true and what we describe is true. The anti-Catholic ad was written by fallacious feminazis.

More reaction.

[via Mark Steyn]