Climate skeptic Tony Heller (aka Steven Goddard) at the 34th Annual Meeting of Doctors for Disaster Preparedness, on July 9, 2016 presents an overview of the history of climate alarmism and its media coverage, inconsistencies between alarmist claims and the climate data record and evidence for fraudulent manipulation and altering of the record by NASA, NOAA and others. It's a rambling presentation covering, back and forth, the past century+ but leaves the definite impression that something is seriously amiss about the current climate alarmist narrative.
More:
Heller gave a similar presentation at a Washington State Senate hearing February 2017. Some senators (Dems) are skeptical of Heller's conclusions but it is interesting that Washington State is at least willing to hear from skeptics like Heller and Don Easterbrook (previous post).
Data manipulation and false data, Data Integrity
Showing posts with label Tim Ball. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tim Ball. Show all posts
Sunday, May 7, 2017
Friday, June 19, 2015
Religion and climate change
Peter Foster: "The Pope’s eco-mmunist manifesto"
George Will (video): "Pope Francis comes from a Latin American, anti-capitalist strand of Catholicism"
Nigel Lawson: "The church of climatism"
Tim Ball: "Is The Catholic Church Burned By The Sun Again?"
Brian Lilley (video): "Progressives find religion in Papal climate change statement"
...Pope Francis’ climate Encyclical, Laudato Si’ (Praise Be), could have come from any branch of the UN, any environmental NGO, or the World Economic Forum. This is hardly surprising since they all promote Global Salvationism, which is based on projections of doom to be countered by morally-charged, UN-centric, globally-governed sustainable development and corporate social responsibility.
... The Pope appears to be blinded by a moral vision that he shares not just with Strong and Gorbachev but with Naomi Klein, Al Gore and David Suzuki: capitalism is evil, is destroying the earth, and involves oppression of the poor and a zero-sum struggle for resources that promotes war.
... The Encyclical demonizes wicked, heartless and short-sighted straw men. This unnamed “they” are proponents of “throwaway culture” and “compulsive consumerism,” of “rampant individualism” and the “self-centred culture of instant gratification.” They claim “an unlimited right to trample his creation underfoot.” ...
George Will (video): "Pope Francis comes from a Latin American, anti-capitalist strand of Catholicism"
Nigel Lawson: "The church of climatism"
... It is a cruel irony that, while it was science which, more than anything else, was able by its great achievements to establish the age of reason, it is all too many climate scientists and their hangers-on who have become the high priests of a new age of unreason.
... But what moves me most is that the policies invoked in its name are grossly immoral.
Global warming orthodoxy is not merely irrational. It is wicked.
Tim Ball: "Is The Catholic Church Burned By The Sun Again?"
Brian Lilley (video): "Progressives find religion in Papal climate change statement"
Labels:
Brian Lilley,
evil,
George Will,
global warming,
Peter Foster,
Pope,
progressivism,
religion,
Tim Ball,
Watts Up With That
Monday, March 16, 2015
Climate debate: Tim Ball vs Elizabeth May
This afternoon, Victoria's CFAX 1070 radio station hosted a live debate between Tim Ball and Green Party climate alarmist Elizabeth May.
[h/t: Anthony Watts]
Listen to the podcast (starting at about the 6 minute mark).
[h/t: Anthony Watts]
Thursday, November 6, 2014
Media Party group-think on global warming
The lede in Ezra's segment is a medley of Media Party reactions to the latest IPCC report. An excellent example of the prevailing media group-think (or, rather, useful idiot group-non-think) :
Labels:
Ezra Levant,
global warming,
IPCC,
Tim Ball,
useless media
Sunday, October 12, 2014
Malfeasance in the "climate change" industry
Dr. Tim Ball makes the case for malfeasance (vs. error/incompetence) in climate science:
How many scientific mistakes separate incompetence from malfeasance? After watching the corruption of climate science for over 30 years, I believe we crossed the line with creation of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Its procedures were established to prove the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis.
... The misuse of specialized methods and procedures is a fundamental problem caused by climatology being a generalist discipline. Most are specialists in a single component, who then, inappropriately, call themselves climate scientists. ... The IPCC brought together such specialists and charged them with proving, rather than disproving, the hypothesis that humans were causing global warming (AGW). It was an unholy alliance that provided an environment for misuse and abuse.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


