Statism

Buy the T-Shirt.

[h/t: Vinney]

Peter Foster on the CIBC's Jim Prentice

"The Sorcerer's Prentice":

... A speech Mr. Prentice gave to the Toronto Board of Trade on Thursday was a jaw-dropper. It was the kind of mushy mixed economics that is regurgitated with tedious regularity every decade or two by those who have forgotten, or never understood, the lessons of economic history.  Mr. Prentice appears to reject market orientation as unaffordable “ideological purity.”

... Adam Smith would instantly have spotted a market-challenged mercantilist. Unfortunately, Mr. Prentice too has embraced the cause that Smith exploded more than two hundred years ago.

... we should perhaps be relieved that Mr. Prentice is no longer at the Cabinet table.

I wonder what's in it for the CIBC.

Dumb-assed Post editorial trashed by readers

Today's National Post editorial "Don’t help drunk drivers get away with it" was, deservedly, given a big thumbs down by readers. What's with the Post these days? Too much Jonathan Kay?

Pushing statism at the gas pumps

Chris Selley is depressed that the press and police are agitating for a new law forcing Alberta motorists to pre-pay before pumping gasoline:

... The problem isn’t the idea, or the inconvenience it portends — which, let’s face it, is minor. The problem is who supports the idea: at least some gas stations, the Edmonton Journal’s editorial board and, most perplexingly, the Association of Alberta Police Chiefs, which is the driving force behind the idea....

Concluding:

Alberta’s seen better times, but it’s still a rich, safe, proud, reasonably law-abiding place most of the world would hack off an arm to live in. It’s a place where you should be able to pay for gas after you pump it, and if it isn’t anymore, the police should be explaining how they can help turn it back into that place.

I agree (with some modifications).  We in BC went through the same thing. Service station operators complained about losses to gas theft but none wanted to do anything about it, presumably because they feared losing business if they went pre-pay and their competitors didn’t. And naturally the police didn’t like having to investigate petty gas theft.

Then a gas attendant, Grant De Patie, was killed while attempting to chase down gas thieves. It was a horrible crime. It had all the emotional ingredients needed to stoke sympathy for a new law, called Grant’s Law, ‘forcing’ gas stations to implement pre-pay. The cops, the gas companies, the press and the emotionally manipulated public were all for it.

What happened to Grant De Patie was God-awful but the fault was first with the criminals who killed him, then it was with Grant’s recklessness in attempting to stop them (I doubt that his job description required him to chase thieves.)

I found the whole thing annoying - first because the law treated me like a thief, second because it was an inconvenience (things have improved since), and third because it became another instance of unnecessary government intrusion. When I expressed these views at gas stations, attendants were defensive (no surprise) - it was all about poor Grant and losses at the pumps.

But of course there are always unintended consequences. Now I happily pre-pay at the pump but never go near the store where I used to buy odds, sodds and lottery tickets. I wonder how that’s working out for the station operators. I’m told a huge part of their profits come from store sales. Also, Grant’s Law required that there be two attendants on duty at night. The gas companies want that expensive part repealed but Grant’s parents and WorkSafe BC are objecting to changes - so best of luck with that!

Personally, I’m all for arming gas attendants, putting thieves in stocks in the public square and giving victims the opportunity to pelt them with rotten tomatoes (and excrement).

On the road to "if it isn't forbidden it's mandatory"

Via Blazing Cat Fur - the NDP wants to put cancer warning labels on cell phones.

That makes three consecutive posts on creeping statism.  Brison's mandatory voting, the 2,4D ban and now cell-phones which, as the story above notes, is about more than just cell-phones:

"It’s WiFi, baby monitors and cordless home telephones, which all operate at 2.4(gigahertz)," 

We gotta get a grip! It's time to break out the tar and feathers and do a few "activists".

Bill Gates' "dangerous pile of cash"

Peter Foster, on the mark, as usual:

Milton Friedman once noted that most businessmen are anti-capitalists. However, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates are moving into a category all their own, putting their vast fortunes behind support for everything from philanthro­statism to just plain statism.

... Mr. Gates has in the meantime become a full-blown Global Salvationist, dedicated to solving the problems of the world’s poor by not merely doling out his own money but by “leveraging” that of hapless taxpayers, muscling pharmaceutical companies, and bugging the entire corporate sector to divert its attention from making money to solving social problems. Indeed, there is a danger that the Saviour from Seattle may do as much damage in the process of giving away his fortune (and that of Mr. Buffett) as he did good in building it.