HOBOsexuality studies at UVic (just for example):
University 'liberal arts' faculties (and increasingly K-12) are institutions of indoctrination that produce graduates who are dumber and lower in productive potential than when they entered. Who in their right mind would knowingly pay big bucks to put their offspring into day care like that?
Also: Blazing Cat Fur, Powerline and a poem.
Showing posts with label absurdities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label absurdities. Show all posts
Monday, May 9, 2016
Sunday, February 7, 2016
Mandatory indigenous studies at Canadian universities
Jason Agnew notes the absurdities and the exciting possibilities:
Since what's good for the goose must be good for the gander, let's force indigenous students to take mandatory courses in the foundations of Western civilization, say, in CAPITALISM. That would do them a hell of a lot more good than "indigenous studies" would do us.
And while we're at it lets make that course in capitalism mandatory for all non-aboriginal students as well. They won't get it any other way. That might help offset the brain damage being done by those studies in the-rosy-side-of-Marxism that most of them are getting now.
Since what's good for the goose must be good for the gander, let's force indigenous students to take mandatory courses in the foundations of Western civilization, say, in CAPITALISM. That would do them a hell of a lot more good than "indigenous studies" would do us.
And while we're at it lets make that course in capitalism mandatory for all non-aboriginal students as well. They won't get it any other way. That might help offset the brain damage being done by those studies in the-rosy-side-of-Marxism that most of them are getting now.
Labels:
`TheRebel,
absurdities,
capitalism,
education,
Indians,
indoctrination,
Marxism,
Yuks
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
Supreme absurdity
In ruling (six to one) that Stephen Harper's appointee to the Supreme Court is not qualified, the Supreme Court has, once again, embarrassed itself.
Christie Blatchford nailed it last Friday:
Today Andrew Coyne agreed that the Supremes' ruling is absurd:
Christie Blatchford nailed it last Friday:
"It is a disgraceful decision, the final howl of which is this: How dare the executive branch, the government, have gone and picked a judge and amended a law?" ...So did Brian Lilley:
Today Andrew Coyne agreed that the Supremes' ruling is absurd:
... "this is just the sort of flaky decision the Court is capable of ..." [although Coyne wanders off into irrelevant territory and ridiculous and gratuitous insults to Judge Nadon.]As did Constitutional Law Professor, Grant Huscroft:
The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in the Nadon Reference is as bad a decision as the Court has made in recent memory.
... The result is absurd, according to Justice Moldaver, because Judge Nadon would become eligible for appointment to the Supreme Court if he were to rejoin the Quebec bar for as little as a single day.
This supremely absurd decision is a result either of gross
over-thinking of the problem or of a conspiracy by activist judges to
disqualify someone they don't like. Both possibilities cast serious
doubt on the "wisdom" of their previous rulings.
In any case, dissenting Justice Moldaver offered a simple remedy. Nadon should immediately rejoin the Quebec bar. All Stephen Harper has to do is reappoint him.
In any case, dissenting Justice Moldaver offered a simple remedy. Nadon should immediately rejoin the Quebec bar. All Stephen Harper has to do is reappoint him.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)