... to ask that you now in view of the evidence retract support from the current IPCC position ... and admit that there is no observational evidence in measured data going back 22,000 years or even millions of years that CO2 levels (whether from man or nature) have driven or are driving world temperatures or climate change.
I won’t be holding my breath waiting for the response. But if and when it arrives it will no doubt cite the latest IPCC report and include a graph shaped like a hockey stick.
If you believe there is evidence of the CO2 driver theory in the available data please present a graph of it.
We draw your attention to three observational refutations of the IPCC position (and note there are more). ...
Given the economic devastation that is already happening and which is now widely recognised will continue to flow from this policy, what possible justification can there be for its retention?
We ask you and all those whose names are associated with IPCC policy to accept the scientific observations and renounce current IPCC policy.
[H/t: A Dog Named Kyoto]