Thursday, June 13, 2013

Epic climate model failure, biased science

Roy Spencer:

... The modellers and the IPCC have willingly ignored the evidence for low climate sensitivity for many years ... The discrepancy between models and observations is not a new issue … just one that is becoming more glaring over time.

... Forgive me if I sound frustrated, but we scientists who still believe that climate change can also be naturally forced have been virtually cut out of funding and publication by the “humans-cause-everything-bad-that-happens” juggernaut.

The UNIPCC definition of "climate change":
"A change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods."
The UN is only interested in human factors. And, the definition implicitly assumes that natural variability is well understood ('...nothing to study here, move along..'). The whole game is rigged from the get-go in favour of proving humans are responsible and ignoring natural variability.


Anonymous said...

I once shared a flight to China in 2008 with an individual who claimed Power Corporation was building all those poluting power plants in China, Hell they were not placing polution controls that were mandidated by Canada. He laughed at me because he said the future is in China and Canada was dead.

Anonymous said...

Roy Spencer eh?

The guy that was a regular writer for TCS Daily, which is run by Republican public affairs and lobbying firm DCI and which lobbies for Exxon?

sure... whatever.

JR said...

"... run by Republican public affairs and lobbying firm DCI and which lobbies for Exxon?"

Oh, you mean this DCI. The one that also worked for:
• The Democratic National Committee
• Office of the U.S. House Democratic Whip
• President Jimmy Carter
• President Bill Clinton
• President Barack Obama
And, no doubt they also work(ed) for Al Gore.

Sure... whatever.