Fiona Harvey’s article in the Guardian on 3 October 2013 Ocean acidification due to carbon emissions is at highest for 300m years misrepresents the scientific literature. This error has propagated across the Twittersphere.
... Hönisch et al. 2012, cited by the State of the Oceans report, showed in Figure 4D that the ocean has been more acidic for most of the past 300 million years than it is now. The rate of acidfication may be faster now, but Hönisch’s graph has a resolution of 20 million years, so cannot address that question.A little misrepresentation goes a long way in the world of climate scare-mongering.
It is unfortunate that an environmental journalist should confuse the rate of acidification with levels of acidity, but appalling that this story was tweeted uncritically by Nature Geoscience anda number of climate scientistsother influential accounts. This is not some esoteric area of climate science. It is well known that CO2 was much higher during parts of the past 300 million years than it is today and therefore ocean surface pH would be expected to be lower. Why was Harvey’s assertion that “[the] oceans are more acidic now than they have been for at least 300m years” not challenged (as far as I can see) by anyone from the scientific establishment?
[via]
2 comments:
Well, the executive summary of the report mentions that all tropical coral reefs will be in terminal decline by 2050, with concomitant massive economic and food security consequences.
Whether the guardian report says 'acidification' or 'acidity' is the highest in 300m years doesn't reallly change that.
which is here:
http://www.stateoftheocean.org/pdfs/IPSO-Summary-Oct13-FINAL.pdf
Post a Comment