Calling Canada Revenue Agency!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
"One should doubtless keep an open mind...though open at both ends, like the food pipe, and have a capacity for excretion as well as intake." -- Northrop Frye, 'The Great Code'
- JR
- South Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
- Classical liberal with a conservative bent. Recovering liberal.
JR on:
DEFEND Freedom - Sign the petition
Donate
_________________
Support our troops
Support our troops
On liberal fascists
"It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their consciences." -- C. S. Lewis
Right Reading
- 'How the Scots Invented the Modern World' - Herman
- 'A History of the English Speaking Peoples Since 1900' - Roberts
- 'The Constitution of Liberty' - Hayek
- 'Atlas Shrugged' - Rand
- 'Liberal Fascism' - Goldberg
- 'On The Wealth of Nations' - O'Rourke
- 'America Alone' - Steyn
- 'Londonistan' - Phillips
- 'Free to Choose' - Friedman
- 'The Road to Serfdom' - Hayek
- 'Socialism' - Mises
I Follow
- Atlas Shrugs
- B&R (with Bob Parks)
- BC Blue
- Blazing Cat Fur
- Blogging Tories
- Blue Like You
- Breitbart
- Breitbart London (Delingpole)
- Cardus
- Celestial Junk
- Claudia Rosett
- Climate Audit
- Climate Depot
- Climate Etc. (Judith Curry)
- Climbing out of the Dark
- Closet Conservative
- Conservapedia
- Crux of the Matter
- Daily Caller
- Daimnation!
- David Thompson
- David Warren
- Dennis Prager
- Dr. Roy
- Drudge Report
- Eye on a Crazy Planet
- Ezra Levant
- Factual Feminist
- Five Feet of Fury
- Friends of Science
- GayandRight
- genuiNEWitty (Greg Renouf)
- Half Wisdom Half Wit
- halls of macadamia
- Instapundit
- Israellycool
- James Delingpole (Breitbart London)
- John O'Sullivan (NRO)
- John Robson
- Laura Ingraham
- Lilley's Pad
- Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
- Mark Steyn
- Matt Ridley
- Michelle Malkin
- Moose and Squirrel
- No Frakking Consensus
- NP Full Comment
- NP/FP Comment
- Raving Canuck (Graeme Gordon)
- RealClimateScience - Tony Heller
- Scaramouche
- Small dead animals
- Sun News Network
- Taki's Magazine
- The 3Ds Blog (Mark Collins +)
- The Blaze
- The Devil's Kitchen
- Theo Caldwell
- Theodore Dalrymple
- TheRebel
- Unsavory Agents
- Vivian Krause's Fair Questions
- Watts Up With That
- William Gairdner
- Xanthippa's Chamberpot
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(270)
-
▼
February
(28)
- JME editors defend publication of "After-birth abo...
- "After-birth abortion"
- Climate debate - skeptics are winning (the data sa...
- FakeGate
- "Systematic fraud" in IPCC's 5th Assessment Report
- Harper-hating media
- Ugly headlines
- Killing the Wheat Board - a step closer
- A progressive's take on Romney
- The new Luddites threaten prosperity
- UAW and "The 99% Spring"
- Climate alarmist Andrew Weaver defends oil sands
- Justin Trudeau's brain
- Breaking: Climate alarmist tells truth
- The certainty of disastrous sea level rises in BC
- Christopher Hitchens vs William Craig - Does God E...
- "The language is a little salty and the reasoning ...
- FrackNation
- Why conservatives SUCK
- Germany's green energy horror story
- Jason Kenney defunds Palestine House
- CPAC - Daniel Hannan on America and Europe
- Ann Coulter at CPAC 2012
- Ann Coulter with Brian Lilley at CPAC
- Supreme Court justice trashes US constitution
- David Suzuki Foundation: Charity or Lobbyists?
- facebook's Mark Zuckerberg is "a self-serving hypo...
- Warren Buffett's tax-avoidance plans
-
▼
February
(28)
6 comments:
From Revenue Canada:
6.1 What are prohibited activities?
A charity may not take part in an illegal activity or a partisan political activity. A partisan political activity is one that involves direct or indirect support of, or opposition to, any political party or candidate for public office.
When a political party or candidate for public office supports a policy that is also supported by a charity, the charity is not prevented from promoting this policy. However, a charity in this situation must not directly or indirectly support the political party or candidate for public office. This means that a charity may make the public aware of its position on an issue provided:
it does not explicitly connect its views to any political party or candidate for public office;
The Suzuki Foundation is in clear violation of the Revenue Canada Act.
Brilliant as usual Ezra!
I think the "Maggots" have come home to roost.
This would have been done years ago if the Media Party cared about Canada.
Let's see what happens now.
Cheers Bubba
Like all charlatans with a god complex, Suzuki and his minions believe they are above the law and the strictures that apply to the great unwashed. Of course, this applies to all the radical environmentalists.
I asked that question of our Prime Minister and my M.P. in a recent email. No reply.
My M.P. Stephen Woodworth has instead decided it is more important to re-eopen the abortion debate. Next election I sit it out,
no time money or energy on his behalf.
When a M.P. puts personal issues ahead of the state of our economy he/she does not deserve our support.
Enjoy your one trick job Mr. Woodworth, you lost mye respect and support.
I took a closer look at the CRA criteria to qualify for charitable status and it seems pretty loosey-goosey. I'm wondering why organizations like, say, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation aren't registered.
At the same time I'm also wondering why the criteria are so frickin' loose.
The CRA is very selective when it comes to enforcing their own criteria. Several years ago a pro-life charity had its charitable status revoked by the CRA on the grounds that demonstrating for pro-life was being involved in politics. This happened under a Liberal government and was nonsense, but it basically ended the organisation in Canada. As they could no longer issue receipts for donations they pretty well ceased to operate. Whether one is pro-life or not, this shows how selective the CRA is since we have numerous organisations openly partisan and involved in politics while retaining their charitable status. The CRA is responsible and the government should force them to apply the regulations equally to all.
Post a Comment