"One should doubtless keep an open mind...though open at both ends, like the food pipe, and have a capacity for excretion as well as intake." -- Northrop Frye, 'The Great Code'
... The hysteria du jour, on campuses and elsewhere, against “appropriation” illustrates progressivism’s descent into authoritarianism leavened by philistinism. This “preening silliness” — the phrase is from the Federalist’s David Marcus — is by people oblivious to the fact that, as Marcus says, “culture blending is central to the development of, well, everything.”
... Listening to Radio Luxembourg late one night, teenaged Keith Richards heard “Heartbreak Hotel,” and “when I woke up the next day I was a different guy.” Bob Dylan, a freewheeling cultural appropriator himself, said, “Hearing Elvis for the first time was like busting out of jail.” Those who would wall off cultures from “outsiders” are would-be wardens.
... Among elites, borderlessness has taken its place among the politically correct positions of our age
... the Left continues to cherish the vision of a borderless world as morally superior, a triumph over artificially imposed difference.
... Yet the truth is that borders do not create difference—they reflect it. Elites’ continued attempts to erase borders are both futile and destructive.
Few escape petty hypocrisy when preaching the universal gospel of borderlessness:
Barack Obama has caricatured the building of a wall on the U.S. southern border as nonsensical, as if borders are discriminatory and walls never work. ... the [well armed] Secret Service is currently adding five feet to the White House fence—presumably on the retrograde logic that what is inside the White House grounds is different from what is outside.
In 2011, open-borders advocate Antonio Villaraigosa became the first mayor in Los Angeles history to build a wall around the official mayoral residence.
“You’re about to graduate into a complex and borderless world,” Secretary of State John Kerry recently enthused to the graduating class at Northeastern University ... moved his 76-foot luxury yacht from Boston Harbor across the state border to Rhode Island in order to avoid $500,000 in sales taxes and assorted state and local taxes.
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg offers another case study. The multibillionaire advocates for a fluid southern border and lax immigration enforcement, but he has also stealthily spent $30 million to buy up four homes surrounding his Palo Alto estate. They form a sort of no-man’s-land defense outside his own Maginot Line fence
They claim to be doing it to save the planet but it won't alter the climate an iota. Their actions only hamper Canadian production and all the benefits that derive from it. Global oil production won't decrease, it is steadily increasing; Canada's share of that production (which is already small) will just get even smaller and so will our entire economy. In the name of phony global salvation, Canadians are being screwed, by our own know-nothing "leaders" and activists:
As Barack Hussein Obama, the idiot mayor of Philadelphia this week and other useful idiots on the lib/left repeat ad-nauseam whenever terrorists strike, obviously motivated by Islam, that it had "nothing to do with Islam (religion of peace)".
Not that it is needed, but more strong evidence of Islam's culpability came with a recently published study of suicide attacks worldwide in 2015 which documented 452 attacks worldwide of which 450 were committed by Muslims:
... Of course, we cannot avoid mentioning the religious element as the most
significant factor that motivates the suicide terrorists throughout the
world. Here’s the most dramatic statistic: 450 of 452 suicide terror
attacks in 2015 were perpetrated by Muslimextremists. One of the
remaining two attacks was carried out by the Kurdish underground. The
other was perpetrated by a woman supporter of a leftist group in Turkey.
Note that the Israeli researcher team was very careful about defining what constituted a suicide attack and how attacks were counted, noting, for example, "we consider the terror attack that took place in Paris two months ago as
a single attack, even though there were seven suicide terrorists.”
... Virtually every one of them is shameful. If you care about the moral nature and intellectual viability of American Jewish life, they are actually frightening.
... I am accused of cruelty, intolerance, bigotry, hate, publicly humiliating someone, ignorance and more. Yet, there is not a hint of any one of these things in my column.
... Other letters and comments accuse me of intolerance, bigotry, ignorance, transphobia, maligning, defamation, slander, xenophobia, foolishness, mean-spiritedness, inflicting “spiritual violence,” lacking compassion, anti-knowledge and more — all without providing a single example.
... It is these letters and comments that are filled with hate; it is these writers who intend to humiliate; it is these people who are intolerant of any view but their own.
First, the low intellectual state. ... Bret Stephens ... succinctly put it recently in his Wall Street Journal column, “American academia is, by and large, idiotic.”
... characteristic No. 2: Instead of intellectual discourse, what we have is the dismissal of the decency of the left’s opponents. If you oppose the left, you are rarely debated. Instead you are dismissed as sexist, intolerant, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic, Islamophobic, racist, bigoted and spewing hatred.
Third, and finally, there is a willingness to make up falsehoods in the service of progressive ideals.
Of course this isn't a problem just with the American Jewish left on the issue of male-female blurring, but with the left throughout the entire West over a wide range of issues.
As the election draws closer, Harper Derangement Syndrome seems to be intensifying. On the way into the CPC campaign rally in Surrey last night, a guy walked back and forth on the sidewalk across the street shouting vile insults at rally-goers lining up outside the venue. It was funny, weird and at the same time disturbing because he seemed genuinely nuts.
And inside the venue, during Stephen Harper's speech, three more "protesters" managed to infiltrate the rally. One unfurled a banner calling for "climate justice" (don't we all know Harper is a climate criminal?), another rushed towards Harper (aiming to do what wasn't clear) getting within a foot of him before being tackled by security guards, and shortly after a third started shouting at Harper from the audience before being grabbed and hustled out.
All in all, it was described by reporters as "the worst security breach of the campaign". The security people really started looking worried after the fracas (for their jobs, maybe?)
Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi doesn’t like the dog whistles in the federal
election campaign. Who is whistling and who are the dogs?
“Dog-whistle politics” is what they call it, and it is not a lovely
term. It comes from the world of campaign consultants, and that is not a
lovely world. ... ... I object to the characterization of those who do not see the world in
the same way as Nenshi cast in the role of the dogs. ...
Nenshi and his ilk don't seem to realize that the term "dog-whistle" (likely an MSNBC host's
brain-f*rt) is itself the left's dog-whistle signal to its bigoted dog-packs to
attack their opponents with accusations of racism.
... Twenty alarmist climate scientists – including UN IPCC lead author Kevin ‘Travesty’ Trenberth – have written a letter to President Obama urging him to use RICO laws to crush dissent by climate skeptics. Their hypocrisy and dishonesty, especially that of the main signatory, almost defies belief.....
Liberal fascism at work. More from Jo Nova.and WUWT.
The “Leap Manifesto” issued on Tuesday by an asylum full of celebrity
victims of Harper Derangement Syndrome – led by Naomi Klein and David
Suzuki – is certainly a thought-provoking platform. The main thoughts it
provokes are: Does achieving celebrity cause a sharp drop in IQandincrease in hypocrisy, or does all-consuming artistic ego and/or
power-hungry socialist inclination prevent all logical thought?...
... You’d think that somebody among the Deep Thinkers might have reflected
that “leaping” doesn’t have the best of historical connotations.
Specifically, it conjures upChairman Mao’s Great Leap Forward, a lurch
to socialized modernization that led to tens of millions of deaths.
... Klein is a great promoter of the notion that the dark forces of
capitalism deliberately manufacture “crises” as an excuse for
dictatorial control. She is quite impervious to any suggestion that the
“climate crisis” might come into the same category.
...The manifesto’s main points were also promoted in a piece in the Globe and Mail on Tuesday by Klein, Suzuki, and three otherwell known policy
experts, Leonard Cohen, Donald Sutherland and Ellen Page.
... The majority of the manifesto is taken up with peddling the fantasy of a
total switch to alternative energy within a couple of decades, and
demanding an end to fossil fuel activity. ... “We call,” note the Gang of Five, “for town hall meetings across the
country where residents can gather to democratically define what a
genuine leap to the next economy means in their communities.”
... The manifesto confirms that one of the things going for Stephen Harper in this election is his enemies.
If these leaping freaks ever got their way we'd soon find ourselves in a totalitarian nightmare forced to quote from Chairperson Naomi's Little Green Book. Their rabid nonsense also has hints of the French Revolution and its Reign of Terror.
Kathleen Wynne has been feuding with Stephen Harper, in part because he refuses to have the feds collect the mandatory deductions for her new Ontario pension plan. And why would he? He is against expanding CPP mandatory deductions, favoring instead voluntary contributions, the approach preferred by, for example, the employers of 2/3 of the private sector workforce.
Wynne’s latest effort is the suggestion that, had Harper been prime
minister instead of Sir John A. Macdonald, Canada’s national railway
would never have been built.
... This is an odd statement, considering the considerable efforts Ottawa
has put into convincing Ontario to get behind Energy East, the
transcontinental pipeline that would move crude from Alberta and
Saskatchewan to Saint John. It’s a truly national project, it would work to the benefit of the country as a whole, would create jobs and expand domestic refining activity ...
... Wynne and Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard have issued a list of
conditions they want met before they will deign to support the project. ... If Sir John A. had faced similar efforts to derail the railway over
patently partisan provincial antics, the great project might indeed
never have been completed. But it wouldn’t have been Ottawa’s fault, it
would have been that of petty, narrow-minded premiers protecting their
flanks at the expense of the country as a whole.
This an example of how the "loony left" earns its name.
Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu’s triumph in Israel’s election this week, so
shocking and appalling to the Western press, is many other things, too. ...
... recognition by Israelis of Netanyahu as the Churchill of our times ... stands apart from virtually all other Western leaders ... a repudiation by Israelis of those same Western leaders ... Netanyahu’s march to freer markets. ... Under Netanyahu’s influence ... Israel systematically began dismantling the welfare state ... sold off Israel’s interests in state enterprises, ... abolished foreign
exchange controls and otherwise liberalized the economy, ... turning Israel into an entrepreneurial marvel ... The Western press, operating as it does from its echo chamber, likes to
describe Israel as increasingly isolated in the world due to its
supposed failure to make peace ... Israel, once the darling of the Socialist Internationale, is fast
becoming the darling of all but Socialist-leaning Europe, Iran and the
ISIS wannabe set. ... Two years from now, Obama will be gone, to be remembered as the worst
American president in memory. Prime Minister Netanyahu will remain in
power and on the world stage
The UN organisation in charge of global climate change negotiations is backing the fast-growing campaign persuading investors to sell off their fossil fuel assets.
Of course the UN is backing an overtly activist political climate campaign. It had already politicized climate "science" through its corrupt UNIPCC. This was an inevitable next step.
If this were to take hold in any serious way, the world economy would indeed be in deep ka-ka.
Frank Gaffney and Brigitte Gabriel respond to questions from a young Muslim woman in the audience of a Heritage Foundation panel on the Benghazi attack:
Predictably the left was 'outraged' on behalf of the Muslim woman and Islam. Dana Milbank at the WaPo characterized the Heritage panel session as an "assault" that devolved into "...the ugly taunting of a woman in the room who wore an Islamic head covering". Here's Politico's response to Milbank's column.
Gabriel's rant was certainly strongly voiced but it had the benefit of being true. And the Muslim woman's comments at the end of the video show no hint that she felt intimidated or "assaulted".
... I saw an event posted on Facebook by a man named Jon Allan, a meeting to plan a protest. ... Walking into the meeting, one would never had expected it was anything but grassroots. ... as time passed and the first protest came to fruition, it quickly became obvious I was observing an AstroTurf fraud. ... When Libby Davies warned us about “American style dirty politics”, she
wasn’t kidding us- only, the tricks she was referring to were coming
from her own side! Just like their smaller sibling LeadNow, MoveOn.org
has been conducting the same type of anti-robocall campaigns in the US.
IKEA ... are considering changing the recipe of their most popular food line - meatballs - in order to help save the world from global warming:
... "On methane...we are aware of the meat issue with greenhouse gases. We
are looking at all our food products from a sustainability perspective
but specifically meatballs. They are very popular and they are also our
most carbon-intensive food item on our menu."
... IKEA actually admits to allowing the kind
of food it serves in its restaurants to be dictated not by the needs of
its customers - who order 150 million plates of meatballs every year -
but by activists from a hard-left environmental NGO like the World
Wildlife Fund. That's not capitalism. That's not customer service. That's eco fascism.
Once again Peter Foster does the heavy lifting and attends an event so that we don't have to. This time it's the nutty left/lib fake "trial" of David Suzuki put on by and for Suzuki fans at the Royal Ontario Museum:
... The event was a cross between a mock trial and a bizzaro Soviet show trial. In show trials the victim had already been condemned. In the Suzuki version, the environmental celebrity’s innocence was never in doubt.
... The audience was treated before the show to sounds of chain saws, and giant projections of open pit oil sands mining and refineries. I think that’s called “priming.”
... Then came the vote. Would it be a nail biter? No, it was a Suzuki super landslide from the audience, and an acquittal from the jury. There were whoops of victory over, er, nobody except that tiny handful of brave masochists who had suffered through this charade then dared to put up their hands for “Guilty.”
.. the fact that a real judge and real lawyers took part brings discredit on the legal system. The real lesson of this mockery of a mock trial was what it said about the objectivity and openness of Suzuki nation. They reach consensus by having conversations in echo chambers. They try themselves, certain of acquittal. They claim persecution while suggesting their opponents should be silenced. If you want to know what’s wrong with the IPCC, and why there is still no real debate over climate, the trial of David Suzuki exposed it in microcosm.
Great column! Suzuki and his nit-wit followers will hate it.
... are terrified they will become targets for hate mobs who have made death threats to the neighborhood vigilante.
Mark and Dana Michelle Gerstle told friends they do not want to talk publicly about Zimmerman for fearthey will be accused of portraying him as a hero - and face a backlash from those who consider he got awaywith murder.
'They are very grateful to Zimmerman for what he did, but they do not want to get involved,' said a friend, who asked not to be named.
... The heroic rescue took place less than a mile from where Zimmerman shot 17 year old Martin in February 2012. ...
This insanity is thanks:
1) to vile leftists who favor mob "justice"
2) to a vile leftist media and race-baiters for misrepresenting the Zimmerman case, and
3) Barack Obama for stirring up racial resentment to satisfy his certifiably nuts, far-left base.
Assuming this story is accurate, good for Zimmerman - obviously he's a stand-up guy.
As for Mark and Dana Gerstle, I have mixed feelings. Given the leftist mob-justice mentality on display they're justifiably fearful for their family's safety. On the other hand, it would be better if they showed some courage. Maybe they'll step up soon.
"It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their consciences." -- C. S. Lewis